<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Business Book Blog</title>
      <link>http://janowskionline.com/blog/</link>
      <description>Mission: Capture the key concepts discussed in business books and articles. </description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 11:33:13 -0600</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/?v=3.2ysb5-20051201</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

            <item>
         <title>Three Questions You Need to Ask About Your Brand - by Keller, Sternthal, and Tybout</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt">Have we established a frame of reference?</p>&nbsp; <ul style="margin-top: 0in"><li class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; mso-list: l19 level1 lfo22; tab-stops: list .5in">The frame of reference signals to the customers they goal they can achieve through using the brand</li><li class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; mso-list: l19 level1 lfo22; tab-stops: list .5in">The frame of reference may change as the product goes through its lifestyle, and as new competitors enter the market</li><li class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; mso-list: l19 level1 lfo22; tab-stops: list .5in">Example: Fed Ex as an overnight delivery service, then as a speed and dependable overnight service, now more focused on tracking capabilities (to compete with email and faxes that are often lost)</li></ul>&nbsp; <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt">Are we leveraging our points of parity?</p>&nbsp; <ul style="margin-top: 0in"><li class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; mso-list: l20 level1 lfo23; tab-stops: list .5in">Think through the points of parity your brand needs to have with competitors if it is to be accepted</li><li class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; mso-list: l20 level1 lfo23; tab-stops: list .5in">New brands &ndash; normally points of parity are thought of new brands</li><li class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; mso-list: l20 level1 lfo23; tab-stops: list .5in">Brand extensions &ndash; can be dangerous, is your point of differentiation go against the minimum requirements for the consumer to recognize you as a legitimate brand in this business</li><li class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; mso-list: l20 level1 lfo23; tab-stops: list .5in">Established brands &ndash; over time points of differentiation becomes points of parity </li></ul>&nbsp; <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt">Are the points of difference compelling?</p>&nbsp; <ul style="margin-top: 0in"><li class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; mso-list: l8 level1 lfo24; tab-stops: list .5in">Three types of difference:</li><ol style="margin-top: 0in"><li class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; mso-list: l8 level2 lfo24; tab-stops: list 1.0in">Brand performance &ndash; how it meets the consumers functional needs based on intrinsic properties of the brand, does the product do what it says?</li><li class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; mso-list: l8 level2 lfo24; tab-stops: list 1.0in">Brand imagery &ndash; when choices are based on experience, who uses the brand and under what circumstances?</li><li class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; mso-list: l8 level2 lfo24; tab-stops: list 1.0in">Consumer insight associations &ndash; when imagery and performance is less attractive, show you know the customer</li></ol></ul><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt">Don&rsquo;t:</p><ul style="margin-top: 0in"><li class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; mso-list: l8 level1 lfo24; tab-stops: list .5in">Build awareness before position</li><li class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; mso-list: l8 level1 lfo24; tab-stops: list .5in">Talk about what customers don&rsquo;t care about</li><li class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; mso-list: l8 level1 lfo24; tab-stops: list .5in">Invest in differences that are easily copied</li><li class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; mso-list: l8 level1 lfo24; tab-stops: list .5in">Focus too much on the competition</li><li class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; mso-list: l8 level1 lfo24; tab-stops: list .5in">Reposition unless absolutely needed</li></ul>&nbsp; <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt">Must make sure position is internally consistent at any point in time. </p>&nbsp; <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt">&ldquo;Ladder up&rdquo; &ndash; first round describes concrete attributes, second round how those attributes change the users lifestyle, third round how better lifestyles lead to happiness</p>&nbsp; <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt">&ldquo;The big idea&rdquo; &ndash; identify the main idea and over time show a variety of attributes that imply the benefit</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://janowskionline.com/blog/2008/01/three_questions_you_need_to_as.html</link>
         <guid>http://janowskionline.com/blog/2008/01/three_questions_you_need_to_as.html</guid>
         <category>Article</category>
         <pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 11:33:13 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Chapter 2: Learning about Markets, Using Market Knowledge - George Day</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt">Superior ability to learn about markets has become vital</p>&nbsp; <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt">3 Trends explain why</p><ul style="margin-top: 0in"><li class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; mso-list: l1 level1 lfo9; tab-stops: list .5in">Changes in complexity of markets &ndash; shorter life cycles, cannot react</li><li class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; mso-list: l1 level1 lfo9; tab-stops: list .5in">Exponential growth in amount of market data &ndash; realtionship databases</li><li class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; mso-list: l1 level1 lfo9; tab-stops: list .5in">Need for share organizational assumptions for strategy development </li></ul><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt">Core Compentency Laws </p><ul style="margin-top: 0in"><ol style="margin-top: 0in"><li class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; mso-list: l1 level2 lfo9; tab-stops: list 1.0in">It is unattainable by money alone</li><li class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; mso-list: l1 level2 lfo9; tab-stops: list 1.0in">It takes time to cultivate</li><li class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; mso-list: l1 level2 lfo9; tab-stops: list 1.0in">It is difficult to imitate</li><li class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; mso-list: l1 level2 lfo9; tab-stops: list 1.0in">It is capable of multple uses</li><li class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; mso-list: l1 level2 lfo9; tab-stops: list 1.0in">It is enhanced by repeated use</li></ol></ul>&nbsp; <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt">Market Driven Learning Process</p>&nbsp; <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt">Must strive to understand what is causing the changes</p>&nbsp; <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt">The Learning Organization</p><ul style="margin-top: 0in"><li class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; mso-list: l6 level1 lfo10; tab-stops: list .5in">Is serious about trial-and-error experimentation</li><li class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; mso-list: l6 level1 lfo10; tab-stops: list .5in">Needs a &ldquo;inquiry center&rdquo; an entity and attitude about how to reconcile the voice of the market</li><li class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; mso-list: l6 level1 lfo10; tab-stops: list .5in">Uses informed imitation of competitors by understand why their competitor succeeded and improving upon it </li></ul>&nbsp; <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt 0.25in">One attribute of a company is its customer focus versus competitor focus </p>&nbsp; <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt 0.25in">Fear-of-failure syndrom &ndash; subverts trial-and-error experimentation</p>&nbsp; <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt 0.25in">Security blanket reseach studies &ndash; studies done after the decision is made</p>&nbsp; <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt 0.25in">Beaware of incomplete mental models and market amnesia</p>&nbsp; &nbsp; <p>&nbsp;</p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt 0.25in">How to organizationally learn about markets</p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt 57pt; text-indent: -0.25in; mso-list: l9 level1 lfo11; tab-stops: list 57.0pt"><span style="font-family: Symbol">&middot;<span style="font: 7pt 'Times New Roman'">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span>Bring mental models into the open</p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt 57pt; text-indent: -0.25in; mso-list: l9 level1 lfo11; tab-stops: list 57.0pt"><span style="font-family: Symbol">&middot;<span style="font: 7pt 'Times New Roman'">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span>Use information technology to enhance learning</p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt 57pt; text-indent: -0.25in; mso-list: l9 level1 lfo11; tab-stops: list 57.0pt"><span style="font-family: Symbol">&middot;<span style="font: 7pt 'Times New Roman'">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span>Activate sensors at the point of customer contact</p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt 57pt; text-indent: -0.25in; mso-list: l9 level1 lfo11; tab-stops: list 57.0pt"><span style="font-family: Symbol">&middot;<span style="font: 7pt 'Times New Roman'">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span>Facillitate knowledge transfer</p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt 57pt; text-indent: -0.25in; mso-list: l9 level1 lfo11; tab-stops: list 57.0pt"><span style="font-family: Symbol">&middot;<span style="font: 7pt 'Times New Roman'">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span>Value continuity</p>&nbsp; <p>&nbsp;</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://janowskionline.com/blog/2008/01/chapter_2_learning_about_marke.html</link>
         <guid>http://janowskionline.com/blog/2008/01/chapter_2_learning_about_marke.html</guid>
         <category>Book</category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 18:40:41 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Business Strategy Note</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Here are my midterm notes for my Business Strategy class at Kellogg PTMBA program. </p><h4><u>Sum up all concepts</u></h4><p><span><br /></span><span>Firms may use their <strong>resources</strong> to shape the competitive <strong>game</strong> in a way that makes the <strong>five forces</strong> more attractive.<br /></span><span>&nbsp;<br /></span><strong><u><span>Value Creation and Capture<br /></span></u></strong><span>Economic Profit = (AP-AC) Q<br /></span><span>Where AC always includes opportunity cost. <br /></span><span>&nbsp;<br /></span><span>&lsquo;B&rsquo; Consumer&rsquo;s max willingness to pay<br /></span><span>Consumer Surplus = &lsquo;B&rsquo; &ndash; &lsquo;P&rsquo;<span>&nbsp; </span>= value the consumer captures<br /></span><span>Value Created = &lsquo;B&rsquo; &ndash; &lsquo;C&rsquo; = total value created<br /></span><span>Firm Value Captured = &lsquo;P&rsquo; &ndash; &lsquo;C&rsquo;<br /></span><span>&nbsp;<br /></span><span>AC curve &ndash; Quantity X axis, Average Cost Y axis<br /></span><span>Productivity frontier curve &ndash; &lsquo;C&rsquo; on X axis, &lsquo;B&rsquo; on Y axis,</span><span>&nbsp;<br /></span></p><h4><u>5 Force Analysis</u></h4><span>&nbsp;<br /></span><strong><span>Rivalry: </span></strong><span>large number of firms, high inventory costs, high fixed costs, lack of differentiation, slow industry growth, high strategic stakes, diverse competitors, capacity in large increments, lack of switching costs<br /></span><span><span>&nbsp;</span><br /></span><strong><span>Threat of Substitutes:</span></strong><span> are there substitute products?<br /></span><strong><span><span>&nbsp;</span></span></strong><span><br /></span><strong><span>Barriers to entry:</span></strong><span> economies of scale, high capital needs, incumbent reputation, switiching costs, learning curve, limited access to distribution, government regualtions, network effects, proprietary technology <br /></span><span>&nbsp;<br /></span><strong><span>Supply Power: </span></strong><span>few suppliers, few substitues for input, costly to switch, suppliers have many other customers, input is more important for buyers, supplier is able to forward integrate<br /></span><strong><span>&nbsp;<br /></span></strong><strong><span>Buyer Power: </span></strong><span><span>&nbsp;</span>one buyer purchased a large share of my output, buyer earns low profits, buyer purchased few other products, buy has full information, easy to switch, buyer can backwards integrate (produce it themselves)<br /></span><span><br /></span><h4><u>Resource Based View</u></h4><strong><span>&nbsp;<br /></span></strong><span>TEST1: Is it distinctly superior? Can it generate profits? Greater &lsquo;B&rsquo;-&lsquo;C&rsquo; in market where it will be used?<br /></span><span>TEST2: Can it be reproduced, moved, or imitated? Truely unique? Legal restrictions? Histroical dependence (brand)? (look for isolating mechanicsm also called ex-post barrier) such as learning curve, firm reputation, switching costs, firm-consumer relationship, network effect<br /></span><span>TEST3: Is this firm the best economic use of resource? Is it cospecialized? Transfer cost higher than its value? Otherwise well pay more than its value to try to keep it, Am I able to aquire the resource for less than the expected total value to me? <br /></span><span>&nbsp;<br /></span><span>Appropriable quasi Rent = value of resouce to us &ndash; value of resource to next highest bidder, most rent we can capture<br /></span><span>Ex-ante limits to competition &ndash; anything that prevents the price bid from reaching full value of the resource<br /></span><span>&nbsp;<br /></span><span>It is hard to manage or create resources into existance, if you can do it why can&rsquo;t anybody?</span><span><br /></span><span><br /></span><h4><u>Game Theory</u></h4><p>Main parts: players, actions, payoffs</p><p>Compeition vs. cooperation, the effect of commitment to a course of action such as sunk costs</p>&nbsp;<br /><p>Industry level effects &ndash; least profitable in one industry may still be more than best profitable in antoher industry</p><p>To determine Nash equlibrium, where no one has incentive to move to another decision, find the dominant or at least the dominated strategies </p><p>Cooperation can be hard when:lots of firms, no history of trust, hidden prices, and bad market conditions</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://janowskionline.com/blog/2007/11/business_strategy_note.html</link>
         <guid>http://janowskionline.com/blog/2007/11/business_strategy_note.html</guid>
         <category>Strategy</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 09:32:42 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Contemporary Advertising Chapters 5-9 by William Arens</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Part 2: Crafting Marketing and Advertising Strategies</p><p>Central route to persuasion - invloves higher involvement with the product or message, focuses on product related information</p><p>Peripheral route to persuasion - lower involvement, fun ad, remember the brand ads</p><p>Habits - Ads break them, aquire them, or reinforce them</p><p>Abraham Maslow - Hierarchy of needs </p><ul><li>Physiological -example:&nbsp;food</li><li>Safety - example: breaks on a car</li><li>Social - example: present for a friend</li><li>Esteem -example: luxury car</li><li>Self-actualization -examvple: golf lessons</li></ul><p><u>Rossiter and Percy's Eight Fundamental Purchase and Usage Motives</u></p><p>Negative or informational motives:</p><ul><li>Problem Removal</li><li>Problem Avoidance</li><li>Incomplete Satisfaction</li><li>Mixed Approach - avoidance</li><li>Normal Depletion</li></ul><p>Positive or transformational motives:</p><ul><li>Sensory gratification</li><li>Intellectual Stimulation or mastery</li><li>Social Approval</li></ul><p>Theory of cognative dissonance - holds that people strive justify their behavior by reducing the dissonance between their cognations and reality, - many people read ads about products they've already purchased to satisfy the belief that the purchase was &quot;good&quot;</p><p>Marketing segmentation - demographics or psychographics</p><p>4 P's of Marketing - Product, Price, Place, Promotion</p><p>3 Rs of Marketing - Recruiting new customers, Retaining current, and regaining past customers</p><p>Fund Allocation - percentage of sales method or share of market method</p><p>Position Strategy - own a word in people's mind that associates with the product example: Levi's owns jeans</p><p>Top down marketing - Do a situation analysis, define objectives, create strategy to reach those objectives, determine the marketing tatics</p><p>Bottom up Marketing - Choose one tatic, then develop a strategy to support that tatic</p><p>5 M's of&nbsp;Media Strategy&nbsp;- Markets, money, media, mechanics, and methodology</p><p>Methods for Scheduling media</p><ul><li>Continuous</li><li>flighting - periods of no advertising</li><li>pulsing - low level all year with higher level at specific time</li><li>Bursting in prime time</li><li>Roadblock - buying same time on all 3 networks</li><li>Blinking&nbsp;- flooded for short burst</li></ul><p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://janowskionline.com/blog/2007/07/contemporary_advertising_chapt_1.html</link>
         <guid>http://janowskionline.com/blog/2007/07/contemporary_advertising_chapt_1.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2007 13:46:54 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Contemporary Advertising Chapters 1-4 by William Arens</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Part 1 : Advertising Perspectives</p><p>Within the text of the advertisement</p><ul><li>Persona - who or what is talking to the customer</li><li>Literary form</li><li>Implied Customers - what does the advertising say about the implied customers</li></ul><p>Message Dimensions Literary forms:</p><ul><li>autobiographical</li><li>narrative</li><li>drama&nbsp;</li></ul><p>Puffery - exaggerated commendation or hype, legal as defined in US, foreign governments have different rules</p><p>Ivan Preston's Six Levels of Puffery</p><ul><li>Best (strongest claim) - &quot;it is the best&quot;</li><li>Best possible - &quot;nothing does the job better...&quot;</li><li>Better - &quot;just works better than the rest&quot;</li><li>Especially good - </li><li>Good</li><li>Subjective qualities</li></ul><p>Advertising falls under comercialized speech laws in the US. </p><p><a href="http://www.gala-marketlaw.com/">www.gala-marketlaw.com</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; - Market Law Site</p><p><a href="http://www.caru.org/">http://www.caru.org/</a>&nbsp;- Advertising to Children Website</p><p><a href="http://www.ftc.gov/">http://www.ftc.gov/</a>&nbsp;- Federal Trade Commission - Regulates US Advertising</p><p>&nbsp;</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://janowskionline.com/blog/2007/07/contemporary_advertising_chapt.html</link>
         <guid>http://janowskionline.com/blog/2007/07/contemporary_advertising_chapt.html</guid>
         <category>Book</category>
         <pubDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2007 13:18:01 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Steven Ambrose’s Eisenhower Parts I and II</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p class="MsoBodyText" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><em>I do not plan to summarize the whole 1200 pages of the two volume biography. Rather I plan to list things I want to remember about Eisenhower&rsquo;s leadership. </em></p><p class="MsoBodyText" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt">&nbsp;</p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt">&nbsp;</p><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA">&ldquo;Long Faces Don&rsquo;t Win Wars&rdquo;</span> <p><strong>Be humble and give credit.</strong> Eisenhower was humble. He always gave credit to his soldiers and was willing to take the blame. </p><p><strong>See for yourself.</strong> During WWII, The General&nbsp;visited the front lines more than any other General. He liked to see the troops and encourage them.&nbsp;His visits helped the front-line soldiers. For example: when he found out officers were living in luxury compared to the troops he&nbsp;gave orders to even&nbsp;out the living quarters.&nbsp;</p><p><strong>Do not fail.</strong> Eisenhower knew that some officiers would underperform. He&nbsp;told Patton that one of the most important yet hardest things to&nbsp;do is to remove the incapable officers as soon as&nbsp;possible.&nbsp;&nbsp;</p><p><strong>Make the most of who you are.</strong> He became Supreme Commander because the French would not follow an English leader. Many of the Generals believe that they should be Supreme Commander, and Eisenhower appeased them by letting them get all the press (this made him even more popular in the press). </p><p><strong>Be decisive.</strong> On D-Day there were several worries about the weather, Eisenhower was decisive, ordering a go. </p><p><strong>Be responsible for the outcome.</strong> Eisenhower&nbsp;had written a statment that&nbsp;he intended to read to the press if D-Day was a failure, where he took credit for the failure.&nbsp;&nbsp;</p><p><strong>Stay in the&nbsp;middle of extermes.</strong> As President, many times he took the &quot;middle way&quot; and compromised between&nbsp;Democrats and Republicans.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://janowskionline.com/blog/2007/01/steven_ambroses_eisenhower_par_1.html</link>
         <guid>http://janowskionline.com/blog/2007/01/steven_ambroses_eisenhower_par_1.html</guid>
         <category>Leadership</category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 13:45:36 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>What Leaders Really Do – article by John Kotter - blog by Karl Janowski</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt">&ldquo;No one has figured out how to manage people effectively into battle; they must be led&rdquo;</p>&nbsp; <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt">Leaders &ndash; coping with change</p><ul style="margin-top: 0in"><li class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; tab-stops: list .5in">Set a direction and create visions &ndash; broad based thinkers willing to take risks</li><li class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; tab-stops: list .5in">Aligning people &ndash; empowering them, getting them to believe the vision</li><li class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; tab-stops: list .5in">Motivate and Inspire &ndash; the more change the more inspiration needed&nbsp; </li></ul><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt">Management &ndash; coping with complexity</p><ul style="margin-top: 0in"><li class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; tab-stops: list .5in">Plans and budgets &ndash; planning is designed to produce orderly results, not change</li><li class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; tab-stops: list .5in">Organizing and staffing &ndash; create human system like architecture</li><li class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; tab-stops: list .5in">Controlling and problem solving &ndash; fast and efficient solutions to problems</li></ul><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; tab-stops: list .5in"><em>This was a Harvard Business Review article that I read published in Leadership Insights a collection of 15 HBR articles. Although it talked about what leaders &quot;do&quot; it does not talk about one of the main Peter Senge leadsership topics: a leader leads through commitment to the vision, a manager manages though compliance. I think this is a key distinction that is maybe implied but not stated in this article. </em></p>]]></description>
         <link>http://janowskionline.com/blog/2006/09/what_leaders_really_do_article.html</link>
         <guid>http://janowskionline.com/blog/2006/09/what_leaders_really_do_article.html</guid>
         <category>Article</category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 06:37:48 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>The Manager’s Job – article by Henry Mintzberg - blog by Karl Janowski</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>HBR Article</p><p>Do managers just plan, organize, coordinate, and control?&nbsp;</p><p>The author of this article doesn&rsquo;t believe so. After conducting studies of managers in the work place the author has come to some other conclusions, classifying the managers role into three main categories:</p><br /><p>1.)<span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </span><strong>Interpersonal Roles</strong> &ndash; a key to authority</p><p><span>&middot;<span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span>Figurehead &ndash; ceremonial duties of someone with authority</p><p><span>&middot;<span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span>Leader &ndash; motivate and encourage employees</p><p><span>&middot;<span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span>Liason &ndash; making contacts outside the vertical chain of command</p><p>2.)<span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<strong> </strong></span><strong>Informational Roles</strong> &ndash; comes from interpersonal relationships</p><p><span>&middot;<span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span>Monitor &ndash; scanning the environment</p><p><span>&middot;<span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span>Disseminator &ndash; letting subordinates in on information</p><p><span>&middot;<span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span>Spokesperson &ndash; communication outside of the unit&nbsp;<br /></p><p>3.)<span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </span><strong>Decisional Roles</strong> &ndash; comes from information</p><p><span>&middot;<span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span>Entrepreneur &ndash;improve the unit or group</p><p><span>&middot;<span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span>Disturbance Handler &ndash;fix problems and handle pressures</p><p><span>&middot;<span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span>Resource Allocator &ndash; deciding who will get what</p><p><span>&middot;<span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span>Negotiator &ndash; making tradeoffs between two things&nbsp;<br /></p><p>The managers&rsquo; effectiveness is related to their insight into their own work which is an integrated job of the roles given in the list above.</p><p>&ldquo;Influence is seen in the leader role, formal authority vests them with great power; leadership determines how much of it they will realize&rdquo;</p><p><br /><span><em>My Thoughts: It is interesting to see a article almost solely on management in a leadership compellation. I wish this article talked more on the differences between leadership and management. It sort of falls into the trap of thinking that all managers are leaders of their subordinates. Anyway I would summarize this as: managers&rsquo; personal contacts lead to information which leads to decision-making. Managers must do all three. I am not sold on the &ldquo;leader&rdquo; part without a further discussion of the difference between a manger and a leader. <br /></em><br /></span></p>]]></description>
         <link>http://janowskionline.com/blog/2006/09/the_managers_job_article_by_he.html</link>
         <guid>http://janowskionline.com/blog/2006/09/the_managers_job_article_by_he.html</guid>
         <category>Article</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2006 07:12:51 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>The Greatest Management Principle in the World - book by Michael LeBoeuf - blog by Karl Janowski</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>&quot;The things that get rewarded get done!&quot;</p><p>I haven't read this book but the quote has&nbsp;come up in a bunch of my reading. For right now I'll paste a link to a book summary here. </p><p><a href="http://my.fit.edu/~dclapp/sectb.htm#grtst">http://my.fit.edu/~dclapp/sectb.htm#grtst</a></p><p>Hopefully I'll get to reading this book. &nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://janowskionline.com/blog/2006/06/the_greatest_management_princi_1.html</link>
         <guid>http://janowskionline.com/blog/2006/06/the_greatest_management_princi_1.html</guid>
         <category>Book</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 11:55:34 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>The Right Game: Using Game Theory to Shape Strategy - article by A. Brandenburger and B. Nalebuff - blog by Karl Janowski</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt">Two main types of games:</p><ul style="margin-top: 0in"><li class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; mso-list: l3 level1 lfo1; tab-stops: list .5in">Structured (rules based)</li><li class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; mso-list: l3 level1 lfo1; tab-stops: list .5in">Unstructured (open market) </li></ul><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt">Business is a combo of both. </p>&nbsp; <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt">In unstructured actions you cannot take away more than you bring to the table.</p>&nbsp; <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt">Egocentric &ndash; focus on your position in the game </p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt">Allocentric &ndash; focus on other&rsquo;s positions in the game</p>&nbsp; <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt">Business strategy is about shaping the game you play as much as playing the game (think of all the companies that have lobbied the government to &ldquo;change the rules&rdquo; of the game)</p>&nbsp; <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt">Business is not a war, there are many times you may op for a win-lose strategy but several other companies have made plenty of money working on a win-win strategy. </p>&nbsp; <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt">Three advantages of Win-Win</p><ul style="margin-top: 0in"><li class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; mso-list: l4 level1 lfo2; tab-stops: list .5in">More opportunities because less explored</li><li class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; mso-list: l4 level1 lfo2; tab-stops: list .5in">Easier to get cooperation </li><li class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; mso-list: l4 level1 lfo2; tab-stops: list .5in">Imitation helps</li></ul><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt">Value Net &ndash; (this sounds a lot like Porter's Five Forces)</p><ul style="margin-top: 0in"><li class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; mso-list: l2 level1 lfo3; tab-stops: list .5in">Customers and Suppliers, </li><li class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; mso-list: l2 level1 lfo3; tab-stops: list .5in">Complementary Products and Substitute Products</li></ul><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt">Five Elements of Game Theory (PARTS)</p><ul style="margin-top: 0in"><li class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; mso-list: l1 level1 lfo4; tab-stops: list .5in">Players</li><li class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; mso-list: l1 level1 lfo4; tab-stops: list .5in">Added Value &ndash; what each player brings to the game</li><li class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; mso-list: l1 level1 lfo4; tab-stops: list .5in">Rules &ndash; how the game is played</li><li class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; mso-list: l1 level1 lfo4; tab-stops: list .5in">Tactics &ndash; moves that shape how one plays the game and perception of the game</li><li class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; mso-list: l1 level1 lfo4; tab-stops: list .5in">Scope &ndash; boundaries that sometimes can be changed&nbsp; </li></ul><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt">Changing Players &ndash; Coke and Pepsi example with Nutrasweet (they created a rival to Nutrasweet just for negotiation purposes, they didn't contract with the rival, the rival should have asked Pepsi and Coke to pay them just for exisiting), Pay me to play</p>&nbsp; <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt">Create Cheap Complements &ndash; Software companies that let any company create hardware</p>&nbsp; <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt">Changing Added Value &ndash; raise your own value (or protect your current value) or lower others (card match game where you burn matching cards to raise the value of yours - Did I read something similar in a judo-economics article?)</p>&nbsp; <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt">Change Rules &ndash; like &ldquo;one price to all&rdquo; rule , or have &ldquo;last bid&rdquo; clauses in contracts</p>&nbsp; <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt">Tactics: Change Perception &ndash; show the effects of a price war by starting a small one to prevent a big one</p>&nbsp; <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt">Change the scope &ndash; Nintendo didn&rsquo;t follow Sega quickly into the 16-bit market so it could prolong its profits in the 8-bit market</p>&nbsp; <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt">Traps to Avoid</p><ul style="margin-top: 0in"><li class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo5; tab-stops: list .5in">Thinking you can&rsquo;t change the game</li><li class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo5; tab-stops: list .5in">Thinking your change has to cause a win-lose situation</li><li class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo5; tab-stops: list .5in">Thinking you have to do something that others can&rsquo;t do</li><li class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo5; tab-stops: list .5in">Failing to see the whole game</li><li class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo5; tab-stops: list .5in">Failing to think you&rsquo;ll need to change the game again after you&rsquo;ve done so already</li></ul><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo5; tab-stops: list .5in">This article was published in Harvard Business Review (R95402). </p>]]></description>
         <link>http://janowskionline.com/blog/2006/06/the_right_game_using_game_theo.html</link>
         <guid>http://janowskionline.com/blog/2006/06/the_right_game_using_game_theo.html</guid>
         <category>Article</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 06:58:36 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>What is Strategy - article by Michael Porter - blog by Karl Janowski</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><span>&nbsp;</span>&ldquo;Strategy is the creation of a unique and valuable position, involving a different set of activities (from your competitors)&rdquo;</p>&nbsp;&ldquo;The essence of strategy is choosing to perform activities differently than rivals do&rdquo;&nbsp;<br /><p>Operational Effectiveness &ndash; performing similar tasks better than your competitors</p><p>Strategy &ndash; performing different tasks or similar activities in different ways than your competitors&nbsp;<br /></p><p><u>Main Strategies</u>&nbsp;<br />Generic Strategies: Low Cost Leadership, Differentiation, Large or Small Segment Focus</p><p>More Detailed Versions of Generic</p><ul><li>Variety-based positioning &ndash; producing a subset of products or services (Jiffy Lube oil only), does not rely on customer preferences </li><li>Needs-based positioning &ndash; targeting a segment of customers (Ikea &ndash; all home furnishings for customers) ), does not rely on customer preferences</li><li>Access-based positioning &ndash; targeting customers who need different activities to reach them</li></ul>&nbsp;<br /><u>Porter&rsquo;s Five Market Forces</u> <ul><li>Threat of new Entry<u><br /></u></li><li>Intensity of rivalry among existing market<u><br /></u></li><li>Pressure from substitute products<u><br /></u></li><li>Bargaining power of buyers<u><br /></u></li><li>Bargaining power of suppliers</li></ul><p>*Many people add that government is the sixth force<u><br /></u></p><p>Productivity Frontier &ndash; a curve of buyer value (Y axis from low to high) versus cost position (X axis from high to low)</p><br /><p>Because of rapid diffusion of best practices operational effectives does not span the test of time. It is not a strategy!</p><table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" border="1"><tbody><tr><td style="width: 118px" valign="top">&nbsp;<br /></td><td style="width: 118px" valign="top">&nbsp;<br /></td><td style="width: 236px" valign="top" colspan="2"><h2>Player 2</h2></td></tr><tr><td style="width: 118px" valign="top">&nbsp;<br /></td><td style="width: 118px" valign="top">&nbsp;<br /></td><td style="width: 118px" valign="top"><p>MAKE Product</p></td><td style="width: 118px" valign="top"><p>Outsource</p></td></tr><tr><td style="width: 118px" valign="top" rowspan="2"><h2>Player 1</h2></td><td style="width: 118px" valign="top"><p>MAKE Product</p></td><td style="width: 118px" valign="top"><p>MM</p></td><td style="width: 118px" valign="top"><p>MO</p></td></tr><tr><td style="width: 118px" valign="top"><p>Outsource</p></td><td style="width: 118px" valign="top"><p>OM</p></td><td style="width: 118px" valign="top"><p>OO</p></td></tr></tbody></table>&nbsp;<br /><p>I like to think of this in Game Theory terms. If there are two companies and both have the decision to make or outsource Product X. If they both choose to make Product X themselves then the only advantage Player 1 can gain is to be more operationally effective than Player 2.<span>&nbsp; </span>Similarly if both outsource the one that finds the best partner wins. In both of these cases it is operational effectiveness (which is easier to copy) rather than strategy that determines the outcome of the competition (in game theory this would be clear by the payout).</p>&nbsp;Two Types of Imitators <ul><li>Reposititioners &ndash; move to a new position</li><li>Straddlers &ndash; hold same position but change to match benefits</li></ul><p>Tradeoffs prevent imitation by creating the need for choice between two positions</p><p>Tradeoffs Occur for Three Reasons</p><ul><li>Reputation and Image</li><li>Activities themselves</li><li>Limits on internal coordination and control </li></ul><p>Quality versus Cost tradeoff is only false when you are behind on the productivity frontier or the frontier shifts outward</p><p>&ldquo;Strategy is making tradeoffs in competing&rdquo;</p><p>&ldquo;Strategy is choosing what not to do&rdquo; - Without tradeoffs you could hold all positions at the same time. Tradeoffs therefore dictate strategy<br /></p><p>Strategy fitness &ndash; all tradeoffs support the same position, activities support each other, lists like &ldquo;core competencies&rdquo;, &ldquo;critical resources&rdquo; and &ldquo;key success factors&rdquo; normally go against fitness&nbsp;<br /></p><p>Three Types of Strategy Fitness</p><ul><li>Simple Consistency &ndash; among activities (e.g. all are aligned on low cost strategy)</li><li>Reinforcing Activities &ndash; activities make the other activities stronger</li><li>Optimization of effort &ndash; </li></ul><p>&nbsp;&ldquo;Strategy is creating fitness across a company&rsquo;s activities&rdquo;</p><p>What Prevents a Sound Strategy, (decreases fitness)</p><ul><li>Misguided View of competition</li><li>Organizational Failures</li><li>Desire to grow &ndash; forces broadening of position over deepening it<br /></li></ul><p>Many go after operational effectiveness because it is tangible and measurable</p><p>Extend your uniqueness</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://janowskionline.com/blog/2006/06/what_is_strategy_article_by_mi.html</link>
         <guid>http://janowskionline.com/blog/2006/06/what_is_strategy_article_by_mi.html</guid>
         <category>Article</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2006 11:42:46 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Blue Ocean Strategy - book by W. Kim and R. Mauborgne - blog by Karl Janowski</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Red Ocean &ndash; markets where there is competition</p><p>Blue Ocean &ndash; new markets</p><p>Example: Cirque Du Soleil over a<span>&nbsp; </span>normal circus.</p><p>Stop trying to beat competition but instead make them irrelevant.</p><p>Industries never stand still.</p><strong>First Principle of Blue Ocean: Reconstruct market boundaries<br /></strong><br /><p>Value Innovation -<span>&nbsp; </span>is the cornerstone of Blue Ocean Strategy, drive costs down while driving value up (like cirque du Soleil they removed animals from a circus driving down costs while driving performance value up)</p><p><strong>Strategy Canvas</strong> &ndash; what are the key factors in an industry, where does the premium players line up?, where do the low cost players line up?, each player has a value curve that they are offering , shows three things: industry factors, competitors strategy, and your value curve all in the same place</p>Four Action Framework - what can you remove, greatly reduce, add,<span>&nbsp; </span>greatly increase to be on a different canvas (create an entirely new value curve) than your competitor? Create a four corner grid for yourself. <strong><br /></strong>&nbsp;<br /><u>Three Characteristics of a Good Strategy</u> <ul><li>Focus of the value curve &ndash; do not diffuse across all categories</li><li>Shape of value curve diverges from competitors</li><li>Clear tagline </li></ul>&nbsp;<br /><u>Beware</u> <ul><li>Over delivery without payback</li><li>An Incoherent Strategy</li><li>Strategic Contradictions</li><li>Internal versus External Market Driven</li></ul>&nbsp;<br /><u>Six Paths that will force you into Red Oceans </u><ul><li>Trying to be best in your currently &ldquo;defined&rdquo; marketplace</li><li>Striving to stand out in a narrow scope of your currently &ldquo;defined&rdquo; marketplace</li><li>Focus on the same buyer groups</li><li>Scope of products and services defined by industry</li><li>Accept industries functional or emotional orientation</li><li>Focus on same point in time and on competitive threats in their strategy</li></ul><p>Substitute products &ndash; offer different form but fill same functionality </p><p>Alternative products &ndash; different forms but fill same purpose (restaurant or cinema fill the night out purpose)</p><p>Strategic groups within markets &ndash; luxury versus economy car builders don&rsquo;t compete with each other, many companies look across strategic groups to create blue oceans</p><p>Purchaser, User, and Influencer of purchasing decisions are all important and all three hold different ideas of value</p><p>Untapped values are normally hidden in complementary services (cinema with a babysitter)</p><p><br /><u>Three principles for trends, they need to be: </u></p><ul><li>decisive to your business</li><li>irreversible</li><li>have a clear trajectory&nbsp;<br /></li></ul><p><strong>Second Principle of Blue Ocean: Focus on the big picture, not numbers in your strategy</strong></p>&nbsp;<br /><u>To Create a Blue Ocean Strategy</u> <ul><li>Draw your &ldquo;as-is&rdquo; canvas</li><li>Look to the six paths, get in the field yourself, find the value </li><li>Create a new canvas based on opportunities in the six paths (eliminate, create, reduce, improve)</li><li>Close the gap </li></ul>&nbsp;<br /><p>Never outsource your eyes. </p>&nbsp;<br /><u>PMS Mapping </u><ul><li>Pioneer &ndash; pursue Blue Ocean,</li><li>Migrators &ndash; Best in class Red Ocean</li><li>Settlers &ndash; pursue Red Ocean</li></ul><p>What is your portfolio PMS map? Revenue, profit, and market share cannot tell the future because the environment changes too fast. Instead use value and innovation to predict the future. </p>Build your strategy around a picture.<strong> <br /></strong>&nbsp;<br /><strong><span>Third Principle of Blue Ocean: Reach beyond existing demand<br /></span></strong><p>Instead of looking for customers, look at non customers</p>&nbsp;3 tiers of non customers <ul><li>those at the edge of your market </li><li>those that refuse your market</li><li>those that have never thought of your market as an option</li></ul><p>Look at their commonalities and find the largest group of untapped customers</p><p><strong>Fourth Principle of Blue Ocean: Get the strategic sequence right: buyer utility then price then cost then adoption<br /></strong>Buyer utility &ndash; price = customer value</p><p>You should not allow cost to drive price. &nbsp;<br /></p><u>Buyer Utility: bells and whistles are not utility</u>&nbsp;<br /><p>Buyer Utility Map (Matrix) &ndash; 6 Levels versus 6 Levers, for each lever ask which level is the greatest block to buyer utility<br /></p><p>Six Levels of Buyer Experience </p><ul><li>Purchase</li><li>Delivery</li><li>Use</li><li>Supplements &ndash; Do you need other products to make this work?</li><li>Maintain</li><li>Dispose</li></ul><br /><p>Six Levers of Utility</p><ul><li>Customer Productivity</li><li>Simplicity</li><li>Convenience</li><li>Risk</li><li>Fun and Image</li><li>Environmental Friendliness </li></ul><p><br /><u>Price</u></p><p>Knowing the price that captures the mass of the market is becoming more important, volumes are becoming more important in profitability, and many product exhibit the network effect (like the telephone, the more people that use it the more useful it is)</p><p>Rival good &ndash; cannot be copied by competitor, example an employee that works for one company cannot work for another</p><p>Non-Rival good &ndash; ideas that can be copied by your competitor<br /></p><p><u>Price Corridor of the Mass</u> </p><ul><li>Same form offerings</li><li>Different form same function</li><li>Different form and function, same objective</li></ul><p>Plot (above) versus price tiers and find volume of customers at each tier</p><p>Factor in the excludability of your product</p><p>Excludability &ndash; the ability to exclude your competitors to using your concept, ideas, and strategy</p><p>Use Best Tier for Pricing</p><br /><u>Cost</u> <p>Derive Cost from target price minus the profit margin you want</p><p>Cost Levers</p><ul><li>Streamline Operations &ndash; MFG and Distro cost reductions</li><li>Partnering </li><li>Change the Pricing model of the industry: time-share, slice-share, equity interest instead of cash, </li></ul><u>Adoption</u> <p>Three adopters &ndash; employees, business partners, and the public</p><p><strong>Fifth principle: Overcome key hurdles to execute the strategy</strong>&nbsp;&nbsp;<br />Execution&rsquo;s four hurdles: cognitive, resources,<span>&nbsp; </span>motivation, politics</p><p>Tipping point leadership &ndash; there are people, acts, and activities that influence a disproportionate amount of influence in any organization, change the tipping points and the rest will follow</p><p>Cognitive -&ldquo;Seeing is believing&rdquo; quickest way to change is to show positive or negative stimuli directly to the people who need to change, show the problem or solution to the stakeholders&nbsp;<br /></p><p>Resources</p><ul><li>Hot Spots &ndash; low resource input but high performance gain </li><li>Cold Spots &ndash; high resource input but low performance gain</li><li>Horse Trading &ndash; leverage excess resources from one area to another (outside of your normal boundaries)</li></ul><p>Move resources from cold spots to hot spots and horse trade outside of your normal resources your excess</p><br /><p>Motivation</p><ul><li>Kingpins &ndash; key influencers and natural leaders</li><li>Fishbowls &ndash; place kingpins in a transparent fishbowl so everyone can see their progress base it on transparency, inclusion and a fair process</li><li>Atomization &ndash; break strategy into small goals so no one can say its not attainabl<br /></li></ul><p>Politics</p><p>Get a strong number two on your team</p><p>Who are my biggest opponents? What is their argument?</p>&nbsp;<br /><p><strong>Sixth principle: To build people&rsquo;s trust and commitment to the strategy you need to build in execution from the start. </strong></p>&nbsp;<br /><p>Need a fair process so people don&rsquo;t feel coerced. </p><br /><p>&ldquo;People care as much about how a decision was produced as what the decision was&rdquo;</p><br /><p>Fair Process</p><ul><li>Engages &ndash; show you want input from everywhere</li><li>Explains &ndash; shows everyone why this is important</li><li>Expectation clarity &ndash; what is expected out of everyone</li></ul><br /><p>Commitment, trust, and voluntary cooperation are intangible capital.</p><p>Imitation Barriers to Blue Ocean</p><ul><li>It does not make sense as traditional strategy</li><li>Brand image conflict helps prevent it</li><li>Natural monopolies may form </li><li>Patents or legal protection</li><li>High Volume can be hard to overcome</li><li>Network externalities</li><li>Loyal following by being first on the market</li></ul>&nbsp;<br /><span>You must monitor the strategy canvas and be ready to move to another Blue Ocean at some point when your ocean turns red. </span>]]></description>
         <link>http://janowskionline.com/blog/2006/06/blue_ocean_strategy_book_by_w_1.html</link>
         <guid>http://janowskionline.com/blog/2006/06/blue_ocean_strategy_book_by_w_1.html</guid>
         <category>Book</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2006 09:12:36 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Dreyfus Model of Skills Acquisition- Web - blog by Karl Janowski</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Hubert Dreyfus has five levels of skill:&nbsp;</p><p>1) Novice - lacks sense of the task, learns rules to follow</p><p>2) Advanced beginner - more rules, uses some situational elements&nbsp;that are learnt from experience but the use can't formalize them</p><p>3) Competent - recognise many context-free and situational elements but can get overwehlmed at the number of rules, understands strengths and weaknesses </p><p>4) Proficient - mostly performs tasks intuitively without analytical thought </p><p>5) Expert - always performs tasks intuitively, stops for relection on intutituion </p><p>So the key here is to improve communication by understanding skill level, when communication seems hard, think to yourself &quot;What skill level am I?&quot; &quot;What skill level is the person that I am talking too?&quot;</p><p><a href="http://www.cornetdesign.com/2006/03/dreyfus-model-experiment.html">http://www.cornetdesign.com/2006/03/dreyfus-model-experiment.html</a></p>]]></description>
         <link>http://janowskionline.com/blog/2006/05/dreyfus_model_of_skills_acquis.html</link>
         <guid>http://janowskionline.com/blog/2006/05/dreyfus_model_of_skills_acquis.html</guid>
         <category>Article</category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2006 20:42:43 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Customer Value Propositions in Business Markets - article by J. Anderson, J. Narsus, and W. Van Rossum - blog by Karl Janowski</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>How to show your customers the value of your product in your sales pitch</p><p>3 Types of Propositions:</p><ul><li><strong>All benefits</strong> - you give the customers the list of all your benefits of your product, the more the better, answers the question, &quot;Why should you buy our product?&quot; little knowledge of their true needs is needed</li><li><strong>Favorable points of difference</strong> - compare yourself against the best competition, show all the favorable points of difference between you and your competitor, answers the question &quot;Why should you buy our product over our compeititor's product?</li><li><strong>Resonating focus</strong> - one or two points of difference that delivers highest value to customer, you need to know your customer's main needs&nbsp;and main compeititor's value, answers the question &quot;Why buy their product when ours has your most important needs in mind?&quot;</li></ul><p>Points of parity - you are equal to your competitors</p><p>Points of difference - you are different than your competitors</p><p>Substantiate Customer Value Propositions - use word equations to show your value</p><p>Value Case Histories - show proof of value through documented studies</p><p>Document customer value - to use for next customer, create &quot;value calculator&quot;</p><p>Use value proposition as a business strategy</p><p>This article was published in Havard Business Review.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://janowskionline.com/blog/2006/05/customer_value_propositions_in.html</link>
         <guid>http://janowskionline.com/blog/2006/05/customer_value_propositions_in.html</guid>
         <category>Article</category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2006 18:44:06 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Mike and Mike in the Morning ESPN News 5/26/06 - blog by Karl Janowski</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Here's a quote on teams I heard on Mike and Mike in the Morning that I wanted to save:</p><p>&quot;When a team is down, problems are at the top&quot; Peter Gammons</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://janowskionline.com/blog/2006/05/mike_and_mike_in_the_morning_e_1.html</link>
         <guid>http://janowskionline.com/blog/2006/05/mike_and_mike_in_the_morning_e_1.html</guid>
         <category>Teams</category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2006 09:34:25 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>
