« November 2007 | Main

January 26, 2008

Three Questions You Need to Ask About Your Brand - by Keller, Sternthal, and Tybout

Have we established a frame of reference?

 
  • The frame of reference signals to the customers they goal they can achieve through using the brand
  • The frame of reference may change as the product goes through its lifestyle, and as new competitors enter the market
  • Example: Fed Ex as an overnight delivery service, then as a speed and dependable overnight service, now more focused on tracking capabilities (to compete with email and faxes that are often lost)
 

Are we leveraging our points of parity?

 
  • Think through the points of parity your brand needs to have with competitors if it is to be accepted
  • New brands – normally points of parity are thought of new brands
  • Brand extensions – can be dangerous, is your point of differentiation go against the minimum requirements for the consumer to recognize you as a legitimate brand in this business
  • Established brands – over time points of differentiation becomes points of parity
 

Are the points of difference compelling?

 
  • Three types of difference:
    1. Brand performance – how it meets the consumers functional needs based on intrinsic properties of the brand, does the product do what it says?
    2. Brand imagery – when choices are based on experience, who uses the brand and under what circumstances?
    3. Consumer insight associations – when imagery and performance is less attractive, show you know the customer

Don’t:

  • Build awareness before position
  • Talk about what customers don’t care about
  • Invest in differences that are easily copied
  • Focus too much on the competition
  • Reposition unless absolutely needed
 

Must make sure position is internally consistent at any point in time.

 

“Ladder up” – first round describes concrete attributes, second round how those attributes change the users lifestyle, third round how better lifestyles lead to happiness

 

“The big idea” – identify the main idea and over time show a variety of attributes that imply the benefit

January 14, 2008

Chapter 2: Learning about Markets, Using Market Knowledge - George Day

Superior ability to learn about markets has become vital

 

3 Trends explain why

  • Changes in complexity of markets – shorter life cycles, cannot react
  • Exponential growth in amount of market data – realtionship databases
  • Need for share organizational assumptions for strategy development

Core Compentency Laws

    1. It is unattainable by money alone
    2. It takes time to cultivate
    3. It is difficult to imitate
    4. It is capable of multple uses
    5. It is enhanced by repeated use
 

Market Driven Learning Process

 

Must strive to understand what is causing the changes

 

The Learning Organization

  • Is serious about trial-and-error experimentation
  • Needs a “inquiry center” an entity and attitude about how to reconcile the voice of the market
  • Uses informed imitation of competitors by understand why their competitor succeeded and improving upon it
 

One attribute of a company is its customer focus versus competitor focus

 

Fear-of-failure syndrom – subverts trial-and-error experimentation

 

Security blanket reseach studies – studies done after the decision is made

 

Beaware of incomplete mental models and market amnesia

   

 

How to organizationally learn about markets

·        Bring mental models into the open

·        Use information technology to enhance learning

·        Activate sensors at the point of customer contact

·        Facillitate knowledge transfer

·        Value continuity